Search Results for "proprietorship GST demand"

24 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice, Remands on Condition of 25% Pre-Deposit. Petitioner challenged assessment order under GST for FY 2021-22 on ground of no hearing; court remanded for fresh consideration subject to pre-deposit of 25% of disputed tax.

The petitioner, Nikasutapes Belt, a proprietorship firm represented by its proprietor Mr. Karthikeyan Vellingiri, filed a writ petition under Article ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 1563 of 2023

The appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 arises from the order of the NCLT, Allahabad Bench dated 06.10.2023 dismissing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Pharmaceutical Distributor for Violation of Natural Justice. Blacklisting Without Show Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Invalid Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. Sujal Pharma, a proprietorship firm engaged in pharmaceutical distribution, challenged a blacklisting order dated 29.10.2021 issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Confiscation Order Under Section 130 of CGST Act for Lack of Mens Rea — Petitioner's Goods and Conveyance Seized During Inter-State Transport, Order Set Aside as Proceedings Under Section 130 Require Intent to Evade Tax, Not Mere Technical Irregularity.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Pampapathy Enterprises, a proprietorship firm represented by its proprietor Sri Imamahusen Majaresab Mannanavar, was transp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Injunction in Trademark 'Covishield' Passing Off Dispute. Cutis Biotech failed to establish prima facie case of passing off as the mark 'Covishield' is descriptive and not exclusively associated with the appellant.

The dispute concerns the trademark 'Covishield'. The appellant, Cutis Biotech, a sole proprietorship, filed a suit in the Commercial Court at Pune see...