Search Results for "promotion review"

554 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 554 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Municipal Corporation's Promotion Process for Superintending Engineer Posts Due to Non-Compliance with Court Directions and Violation of Service Rules

The High Court allowed a writ petition filed by four Executive Engineers of Municipal Corporation challenging their exclusion from promotion to Superi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Peon's Claim for Promotion to Tracer Post, Upholds Direct Recruitment Requirement. Post of Tracer Must Be Filled by Direct Recruitment Under Rule 5(1)(e) of Orissa Subordinate Architectural Service Rules, 1979, Not by Promotion from Peon Cadre.

The petitioner, Jyostnamayee Mishra, was appointed as a peon in the Works Department of the State of Odisha in 1978. She sought promotion to the post ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Contempt Case for Promotion Benefits — Consequential Benefits Limited to Penalty Arrears, Not Retrospective Promotion. Cancellation of Promotion Not Challenged and Contempt Court Cannot Grant Relief Beyond Main Order.

The appellant, K. Samba Moorthy, was a Probationary Officer in Bank of Baroda appointed in 1983. In 1999-2000, show cause notices were issued for alle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Seniority Protection in Municipal Corporation Promotion. Petitioner's claim for deemed promotion date from 1997 fails as he was not empanelled due to adverse confidential reports and lack of vigilance clearance.

The petitioner, Ravindra Murlidhar Kalekar, was appointed as a Sub Engineer (Civil) with the Mumbai Municipal Corporation on 3rd February 1975. He was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Promotions in Municipal Corporation Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Policy and Seniority Rules. The court held that promotions must follow the prescribed reservation policy and consider seniority, and directed reconsideration of promotions.

The petitioner, Narendra Barde, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the promotion of Respondent Nos. 2 an...