Search Results for "price increase"

993 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 993 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Lease Rent Revision Based on Ready Reckoner Rates for Housing Societies in Bandra. Court holds that linkage of lease rent to land value is not per se prohibited and the Government Resolutions of 2006, 2012, and 2018 are constitutionally valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, upheld the constitutional validity of Government Resolutions (GRs) dated 29th May 2006, 12th Dece...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Land Owners in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Applied Cumulative Rate of Annual Increase and Reduced Development Cut, Determining Market Value Based on Highest Bona Fide Exemplar Sale Deed from 1979.

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land measuring 297 Kanals and 1 Marla in Jassi Pau Wali, Bhatinda, Punjab, for establishing the Bhatinda Int...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Kerosene Dealers' Association Challenging Inclusion of VAT in Ceiling Price. State's Power to Fix Maximum Price Including Taxes Upheld Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The petitioners, Mumbai Kerosene Dealers' Association and its members, who are wholesale kerosene dealers holding licences under the Maharashtra Keros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes KIADB Order Demanding Excess Lease Premium in Industrial Land Allotment — Refund of Rs. 100 Lakhs Ordered with Interest. KIADB Cannot Charge Premium Exceeding Government-Notified Rate Under Section 3(1) of Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Hadee Forging Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was allotted 2 acres of industrial land by the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging NPPA's Interpretation of DPCO 2013 — Price Ceiling Applicable Only to Formulations in First Schedule. The court held that NPPA cannot impose price ceiling on non-scheduled formulations under DPCO 2013, as the order's language is clear and unambiguous.

The petitioners, M/s. Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. and the Indian Drug Manufacturers Association (IDMA), challenged the interpretation and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Drug Price Fixation Notifications for Frusemide and Theophylline Formulations. Price Fixation Under DPCO 1995 is a Legislative Exercise and Does Not Require Individual Hearing.

The appeals by special leave challenged the decision of the Allahabad High Court which had rejected writ petitions filed by the appellants, M/s T.C. H...