Search Results for "presumption under Section 139"

819 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 819 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Conviction in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Non-Examination of Complainant's Partner. Failure to Prove Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Complainant Firm Not Properly Represented.

The petitioners, Sidharth Narayan Siddhapur and M/s Taurus Earthmovers Limited, were the accused in a complaint filed by M/s Fluidmac, a partnership f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Borrowing of Rs.20,000/- and Issuance of Cheque Established; Acquittal Set Aside.

The appeal arises out of the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Sagar dated 26.08.2011 in C.C.No.124/2010 wherei...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Restored. Complainant's Evidence Sufficient to Prove Debt and Liability Despite Accused's Defence of Property Dispute.

The appellant, Smt. F. Chandra, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment dated 0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 NI Act. Settlement Agreement Creates Fresh Liability, Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Not Rebutted.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, M/s. Cabral & Co. and its proprietor Francis Simon Cabral, against their convi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused; failure to prove legally enforceable debt not established.

This is an appeal by the complainant against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Accused Failed to Prove Defence That Cheque Was Issued for Different Transaction and Cash Paid.

The complainant, Stanley Barros Pereira, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the accused, Julieta Cot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Complainant's Loan of Rs.2,50,000 for Education and Family Necessities Supported by Evidence; Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused.

The complainant, Smt H B Bhagyalakshmi, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheque Was Issued as Security, Not for Repayment of Loan.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Vyomesh Jitendra Trivedi, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...