Search Results for "premium floor space index"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "premium floor space index"

28 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Dispute Referred to Sole Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Signatory Status. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Agreement Between Petitioner and Respondent Is Prima Facie Established Through Email Exchange and Conduct.

6 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Sunteck Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Municipal Corporation's Mandamus for Land Acquisition Due to Lapsed Reservation and Financial Incapacity. Reservation under Development Plan Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966, and Acquisition Not Mandated as Corporation Lacked Funds Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute involved a land reservation under the Kolhapur development plan sanctioned in 1999 for public purposes like parking and garden. The landow...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of CIDCO's Lease Cancellation in Tender Dispute. The court held that CIDCO's cancellation was unjustified as the partnership firm's bid was initially accepted, changes were authorized, and no concrete breaches of tender terms were proven, applying principles of promissory estoppel and administrative fairness.

29 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from a tender called by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO) on 11.06.2008 for lease of land near ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building Under MHADA and MCGM Regulations — Held That Occupiers Have No Right to Insist on Repair When Building is Unsafe.

16 Oct 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Grace Estate Development Venture and by residents of Ashish Building No. 21 CHS Ltd challenging the demo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Flyover Construction on Environmental Grounds — Held That Project Did Not Require Environmental Clearance as It Was a Linear Project on Existing Highway.

8 Aug 2018

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a flyover and road widening project on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.

30 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against CIDCO's Refusal to Grant NOC for Additional FSI for IT/ITES Development. Government Order dated 31st August 2009 enabling additional FSI for IT/ITES use is binding on CIDCO as a planning authority.

11 Jun 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Shakti Commercial Premises Society Ltd., a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Coop. Societies Act, 1960, filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Construction in Powai and Tirandaz — No Breach of Tripartite Agreement or ULC Act Exemption Found. The court held that the construction was in accordance with sanctioned plans and permissions, and the challenge to the exemption order was barred by delay and laches.

22 Feb 2012

The judgment concerns three Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by Kamlakar Motiram Satve, Rajendra Thacker, and Medha Patkar challenging the con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against CIDCO's Revocation of Change of User Permission — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Applied Against Public Authority. CIDCO Cannot Revoke Permission After Allottee Acts Upon It to Its Detriment.

19 Dec 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Ambica Developers, a sole proprietorship of Mr. Madeva Patel, was allotted Plot No. 1 in Sector 1, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Notice for Unauthorized Change of Land Use in Leasehold Property — Petitioners Not Liable for Unauthorized Use by Tenant Without Prior Permission. Leasehold Property Dispute Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Demand for Additional Premium and Penalty Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice.

18 Oct 2006

The petitioners, Tulsiram Rangwala Trust, Rikhiram T. Arora, and Shivram Enterprises (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged a demand notice dated 30th March 20...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)