Search Results for "potential yield method"

37 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 40,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare. Irrigated Land with Development Potential Justifies Higher Market Value Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Fatimabegum, owned agricultural land in Gondwakadi, Yavatmal, comprising Gat No.79 (4.64 hectares) and Gat No.53 (4.46 hectares). The l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses VIDC Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases, Enhances Compensation for Claimants. Court applies multiplier method based on potential yield and market value, rejecting belated objections to valuation.

The case involves multiple first appeals filed by Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) against the judgment of the Reference Court enhan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Judicial Review of State Actions in Contractual Disputes: Evolution and Current Scope. From Traditional Boundaries to Modern Oversight: Ensuring Fairness and Transparency in State Contractual Matters

The evolution of judicial review in India regarding state actions in contractual and tender disputes. Historically, such disputes were seen as private...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 20,000 per Hectare. Market Value Determined by Comparable Sale Method with 20% Deduction for Development Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Harish Ratanlal Bhansali, was the owner of agricultural land Survey No. 312/B measuring 4 Hectare 90 R situated at village Goregaon, Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Rate of Rs.6 per sq m Upheld for Agricultural Land. Reference Court's Rejection of Enhanced Compensation Affirmed as Appellant Failed to Produce Comparable Sale Instances or Evidence of Higher Market Value.

The case involves a first appeal filed by Dr. Jaiwant B. Sardessai against the judgment and award dated 8/03/2004 passed by the Additional District Ju...