Search Results for "postal delay"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "postal delay"

209 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 209 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Striking Off Written Statements in Commercial Suit — Time Limit of 120 Days Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

28 Apr 2026

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by defendants in a commercial suit instituted by Tata Steel Ltd. (respondent) for recovery of amount...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in MRTP Act Compensation Dispute, Upholding NCLAT's Interest Award. Developer Found Guilty of Unfair Trade Practice for Delayed Construction and Cancellation, Entitling Complainant to Compound Interest Under Section 12B of Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.

31 Jan 2023

The dispute originated from a 1989 flat allotment in Ghaziabad where the original applicant died and was succeeded by her daughter-in-law, who continu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2020

The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Execution Application for Interest on Arbitral Award During Pendency of Challenge — Bank Guarantee Furnished Under Supreme Court Order Constitutes Payment into Court Under Order 21 Rule 1 CPC

1 Mar 2017

The case involves an execution application filed by Bhadani Associates (the claimant/decree-holder) seeking to enforce an arbitral award dated 16th Ja...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Detenu's Bail Status and Inadequate Verification of In-camera Statements. The court held that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction was vitiated as it did not consider the detenu's bail status and the in-camera statements were not properly verified, violating Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

18 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Viki Baban Galte, challenged a preventive detention order passed on 26 April 2016 by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail in Criminal Cases Not Considered. The court held that failure to consider the detenu's bail status vitiates the subjective satisfaction required for preventive detention under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

18 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Viki Baban Galte, challenged a preventive detention order dated 26 April 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant's claim of loan advanced to friend fails as no legally enforceable debt existed, leading to acquittal under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

16 Jul 2015

The appellant, Shri Datta S. Nadkarni, filed a criminal appeal challenging the acquittal of the first respondent, Mr. Salvador Fernandes, from an offe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind to Witness Statements. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider in-camera statements, violating the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

14 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Ravi Hanumant Thorat, brother-in-law of the detenu Sahadeo @ Sada Laxman Dhavare, challenged the validity of a preventive detention or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Dismissal on Limitation Grounds. Court holds that limitation period for filing complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 runs from date of receipt of notice by accused, not from date of dispatch.

24 Feb 2010

The appellant, Krishnakumar Vishwanathprasad Chaturvedi, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution and Consideration of Representation. Delay of Over Five Months in Executing Detention Order and Three Months in Considering Representation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act.

2 Feb 2005

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohd. Kunhi Kallattra, challenged a detention order dated 28.2.2002 issued by the Secretary (Preventive Detenti...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)