Search Results for "post-trap panchanama"

28 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Appasaheb Narayan Jadhav, a Talathi (public servant) in Dafalapur, Sangli, was convicted by the Special Judge, Sangli, for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Doubtful Trap — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 not proved; complainant turned hostile; trap witness not independent.

The appellant, Manohar Bodade, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case No. 01/1993 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (Appellant No.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Narendra Pralhadrao Mahajan, a Junior Clerk in the Court of 3rd Joint Judicial Magistrate, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping, Murder, Extortion, and Destruction of Evidence. Conviction based on circumstantial evidence including CDRs, extra-judicial confession, and last seen evidence upheld.

The case involved two appeals before the Bombay High Court against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, convicting the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Acquittal in Prevention of Corruption Case Due to Hostile Complainant and Plausible Defence. Foundational Facts of Demand and Acceptance Not Established as Complainant Admitted Receiving Full Entitlement and That Disputed Amount Was His Own Contribution.

This criminal appeal was filed by the State of Maharashtra through the Anti-Corruption Bureau against the acquittal of Anandrao Rajaram Patil, a Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Appeal Challenges Conviction and Sentence for Offences Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act Imposed by Special Judge, Beed.

The appellant, Sudhakar Dound, a police constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Beed for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal by Accused Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction Challenge Hinges on Proof of Demand and Credibility of Complainant.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Special Court under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, alleg...