Search Results for "post-dated cheque"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Restores Conviction for Dishonour of Cheque. Complainant's Financial Capacity to Advance Loan and Legally Enforceable Debt Established, Reversing Acquittal by Sessions Court.

The appellant, Krishna Gopal Khetan, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Order to Vacate Premises — Failure to File Undertaking and Pay Dues Not Contempt as Substantive Compliance Achieved.

The contempt petition was filed by Hukum Chand Deswal (petitioner) against Satish Raj Deswal (respondent) alleging wilful disobedience of the Supreme ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit Based on Dishonoured Cheques — Defendant Must Deposit Full Suit Amount. Court holds that under Order XXXVII CPC, leave to defend can be granted on condition of deposit when defence is not bona fide or raises no triable issue.

The petitioner, Navnath R. Adak, was the defendant in Summary Suit No. 464 of 2015 filed by the respondent, Rakesh Giridharilal Rungta, under Order XX...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments. Directors Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Allegations of Their Role in Company's Day-to-Day Affairs.

The petitioners, who were directors of the accused company, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Holds That Payments Made to Authorized Representatives of Partnership Firm Are Valid Under Contract Act. Burden of Proof Shifts to Defendants When Plaintiff Proves Payment to Persons Held Out as Authorized in Brochure.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Mr. Sharad Prabhudas, against the judgment of the First Appellate Court which rever...