Search Results for "police outpost incident"

142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) Decides Criminal Appeals Against Conviction and Acquittal in Land Dispute Murder Case. Convicted Accused Under Sections 147, 148, 302, 324, 325 read with 149 IPC and Section 135 Bombay Police Act Appeal; State Challenges Acquittal of Co-Accused on Same Charges.

The case arose from a land dispute in village Yelamwadi, Tq. Chakur, Dist. Latur. Muktabai, the complainant, lived with her husband and children. Her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder Under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 IPC. The Court Assessed the Evidence of a Sole Interested Eye-Witness and the Effect of Hostile Witnesses.

The two criminal appeals arise from Sessions Case No. 234 of 2008, wherein the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune convicted six accused persons for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convicted Accused in Mass Murder Case. Injured Eye Witness Testimony and Prompt FIR Naming Accused Led to Conviction Under Section 302 Read with Section 149 IPC Despite Defence Challenges on Identification and Motive.

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from the conviction of three appellants by the Sessions Court, Solapur, for offences under Section 302 r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4, 6, 8, 12 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as victim's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant, Mahadeo @ Nana Gundiba Khandale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati in Special (POCSO) Case No.8/2015 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Hawaldar in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, a Police Hawaldar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Karad for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1000 from the complainant to av...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Haridas Jamunah, a Police Head Constable, was convicted by the Special Court, Washim for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.1000 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 307 and 325 IPC in Water Dispute Assault Case. Conviction Stems from Incident Where Victim Suffered Severe Head Injuries Allegedly Caused by Spade and Stick.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, in Sessions Case No. 118 of 1993, where the two appellants were convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 2011

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, Shailendrakumar Satyanarayan Thakur, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, on 25th October 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yashwant Sambhaji Dadmal, a police constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur in Special Case No.6 of 1999 for offences ...