Search Results for "pharmaceutical"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "pharmaceutical"

277 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 277 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging NPPA's Interpretation of DPCO 2013 — Price Ceiling Applicable Only to Formulations in First Schedule. The court held that NPPA cannot impose price ceiling on non-scheduled formulations under DPCO 2013, as the order's language is clear and unambiguous.

10 Apr 2026

The petitioners, M/s. Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. and the Indian Drug Manufacturers Association (IDMA), challenged the interpretation and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Appointees in Drug Inspector Selection Case, Reversing High Court's Quashing of Appointments. The Court found no arbitrariness or illegality in the recast eligibility criteria, selection committee composition, or viva-voce marks allocation under the Jammu and Kashmir Subordinate Services Recruitment Rules, 1992, and reinstated the 2009 appointments.

28 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from the selection process conducted on 8 September 2009 for appointing drug inspectors in Jammu and Kashmir, resulting in the appoi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Allowability of Sales Promotion and Physician Sample Expenses is Invalid.

10 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Abbott India Limited (successor of Solvay Pharma India Ltd.), challenged a notice dated 27 March 2015 issued under Section 148 of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Use of 'RPG' Mark by Defendants in Passing Off and Trade Mark Infringement Suit. The court held that the Defendants' use of 'RPG' as a prominent feature in their trade name was deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and likely to cause confusion.

21 Mar 2022

The Plaintiff, RPG Enterprises Limited, a multi-industry Indian conglomerate, filed a suit against the Defendants, Riju Ghoshal and Poulami Ghoshal, f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Injunction in Pharmaceutical Trademark Dispute Due to Delay and Acquiescence. Similarity of marks alone insufficient for interim relief when defendant has used its registered mark for nearly a decade without evidence of confusion.

15 Mar 2017

The plaintiff, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Wockhardt Ltd and Overseas African Remedie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Eris Lifesciences in Trademark Infringement Case. Phonetic Similarity Between 'NEBISTAR' and 'NEBISTOL' Leads to Restraint Order Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

23 Dec 2015

The Plaintiff, Lupin Limited, filed a suit alleging that the Defendants, Eris Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. and others, were infringing its registered tradem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interlocutory Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'CHERI' vs 'MULTI CHERRY' — Preliminary Issue Under Section 9A CPC Pending. The court declined to hear the ad-interim application due to procedural bars: the Appeal Court's order in the Clause XIV leave appeal and the Defendants' application for a preliminary issue on jurisdiction under Section 9A CPC.

24 Jun 2015

The Plaintiffs, Indchemie Health Specialties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

10 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Contract for Manufacture of Pharmaceutical Products Held to be Sale, Not Works Contract Under Section 194C of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the ITAT's decision that the agreement between the assessee and the manufacturer was a contract for sale of goods, as property passed only on delivery and the agreement was on a principal-to-principal basis.

12 Mar 2010

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Passing Off Action — Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Khandelwal Laboratories Ltd. — Trade Mark CEFO v. CEFI. The court found that the marks CEFO and CEFI are deceptively similar, especially in the pharmaceutical context, and granted temporary injunction under Section 27 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

27 Sep 2005

The plaintiff, Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for passing off against Khandelwal Laboratories Ltd. seeking interim injunction to restrain t...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)