Bombay High Court on Slum Evictions: Contractual Disputes to Be Raised Separately
19 Jan 2026The Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging eviction orders passed by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and the Apex Grievance Redressal Committe...
Search Results for "permanent alternate accommodation agreement"
137 result(s) found
Found 137 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India Disinvestment and Transfer of Employees. Transfer of undertaking under Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require consent of workmen and continuity of service is protected.
13 Mar 2023The petitioners, three trade unions representing employees of Air India and its subsidiaries, filed writ petitions challenging the disinvestment of Ai...
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Award in Property Dispute — Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Allowed on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the arbitrator's computation of amounts and interest under clause 9 of the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements was patently illegal and contrary to the terms of the contract.
23 Aug 2022The petitioners, Dhiraj Lakhamashi Shah and another, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an in...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Petition in Eviction Suit After 48 Years of Litigation — Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Ignoring Admissions and Evidence of Subletting. The Court held that the appellate court failed to consider the tenant's admission of subletting and the landlord's bona fide need, thereby warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
4 Sep 2017The case involves a long-standing eviction suit filed in 1969 by the petitioners' father (landlord) against the respondent-tenant (Jivraj Bhanji) in t...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver to Take Possession of Tenements for Redevelopment Despite Non-Signatory Members' Objection. Non-cooperating members bound by society's development agreement; Court Receiver appointed to facilitate redevelopment of dilapidated building.
22 Dec 2016The petitioner, M/s. R.R.B. Realtors Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of ...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute. Developer Granted Interim Relief to Take Possession of Tenements from Non-Cooperating Members Pending Arbitration Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
22 Dec 2016The Petitioner, M/s. R.R.B. Realtors Pvt. Ltd., a real estate developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Building Declared Dilapidated — Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Procedure Under MMC Act Before Demolition. Tenants' Right to Hearing Upheld Under Sections 354 and 488 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.
16 Oct 2014The petitioners, eleven tenants residing in a building called Habib Terrace in Kurla, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Appointment of Court Receiver and Directions for Possession in Redevelopment Dispute — Non-Consenting Members Directed to Vacate to Facilitate Redevelopment. Court held that overwhelming majority of society members having consented, non-consenting members cannot obstruct redevelopment and must hand over possession through Court Receiver.
3 Oct 2013The appeals arose from a judgment of the Learned Single Judge dated 16 September 2013 in a motion taken out by the first respondent (developer) in a s...
- 184
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.
19 Nov 2012The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Against Housing Society and Flat Owners for Lack of Arbitrable Dispute. Dispute over alleged oral agreement for redevelopment of building not covered by arbitration clause in share certificate.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, M/s Heritage Lifestyle & Developers Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...
- 83
