Search Results for "pay re-fixation"

73 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Alleged Excess Payments from D.Ed College Employees — Recovery Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Refixation of Pay Scale and Grade Pay Set Aside as Unilateral and Without Opportunity of Hearing.

The judgment concerns a group of nine writ petitions filed by employees of D.Ed colleges in Maharashtra, challenging the recovery of amounts allegedly...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes University Order Revising Pay Scale with Retrospective Effect Without Notice - Violation of Natural Justice in Service Matter. The court held that any order affecting the pay of an employee with retrospective effect must be preceded by a notice and opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, Dr. Bugui Dessai, was appointed as a Reader in Inorganic Chemistry at Goa University in June 1987 and confirmed in service in June 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Pension Refixation Based on Post-Retirement Upgradation of Post. Pension of retired government servant cannot be revised on basis of upgraded pay scale of post after retirement.

The petitioner, Dr. J.A. Patil, retired as Director of Seeds Certification in the State of Maharashtra on 30th June 1980, holding a Class I post with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Excess Salary from Retired Employee; Directs Pension Refixation and Payment of Benefits with Interest. Recovery impermissible as excess payment made for over five years and employee belongs to Class III, applying principles from State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The petitioner, Gendlal Dharkar, was initially appointed as a Tracer in Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran on 27/09/1991. Over the years, he received a ti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal of Headmistress Against Refixation of Pay. Court Holds That Employee Promoted to Higher Cadre Cannot Claim Pay Parity with Junior in Lower Cadre Under G.O.Ms.237 and Rule 4(3) of Tamil Nadu Revised Scales of Pay Rules, 1989.

The appellant, serving as Headmistress in an aided school, appealed against the dismissal of her writ petition seeking refixation of her pay. She was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Pensioner’s Petition for Stepping Up of Pay on Parity with Junior; Holds Denial After Earlier Tribunal Order in Identical Case Violates Article 14. Pay Fixation Anomaly Must Be Remedied for Senior Employees When Juniors Draw Higher Pay Due to Pay Commission Revisions.

The petitioner, a retired Junior Scientific Officer in the Ministry of Defence, sought refixation of his pay on par with his junior, Sahasrabudhe, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Setting Aside of Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Retired Government Employee. Recovery of excess payment made after retirement causes hardship and is not sustainable.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Deputy Director of Health Services and the Block Medical Officer against an order of a single judge setti...