Search Results for "pancha"

617 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 617 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Mixing and Sampling from Bulk Container Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused Suryabhan Ukarda Rokade for offences under the Prevention of Food Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Contradict Each Other and Complainant's Testimony is Unreliable Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Laxman s/o Narayan Kale, a government servant working with Nagpur Improvement Trust, was convicted by the Special Judge for demanding a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Challenging Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Accused Surveyor Had Been Found Guilty of Demanding and Accepting Bribe for Conducting Land Survey.

This criminal appeal was preferred by a Second Division Surveyor against his conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, by the trial cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Misapplication of Section 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Charge Framed Under Wrong Provision Invalidates Conviction

The appellant, a Junior Clerk in a Sessions Court, was convicted under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for allegedly demanding and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ghanshyam Hari Pagare, a Talathi (revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Nashik, in Special Case No.4 of 1993 for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case for Possession of 4.5 kg Ganja — Ten Years' Rigorous Imposition Confirmed. Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Proved Conscious Possession and Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act, 1985.

The appellant, Ishwar Buddha, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS Court, South Goa, for an offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case. Acquittal upheld as prosecution failed to prove cruelty and abetment to suicide beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Kanchan Chodankar for offences under Sections 498-A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code. The case aros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Sub-Registrar in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mohan Bhaiyyalal Shrivastava, was a Sub-Registrar at Barshitakli, Akola. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Akola in Special Case N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in NDPS Act Case for Possession of 2.225 kg Charas. Mandatory compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act not triggered as recovery was from bag, not person.

The appellant, Krishna S/o Kavi Raj Malla, was convicted by the Special Judge of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Court, Mapusa, for the offen...