Search Results for "owner impleadment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "owner impleadment"

341 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 341 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Third Parties in Specific Performance Suit Under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC — Co-owners and Signatories to Development Agreement and Partition Deed Held Necessary for Effectual Adjudication.

15 Sep 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Divya Builders, a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of contract and permanent injunction against...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Third-Party Purchaser Seeking Impleadment in Suit for Specific Performance — Plaintiff Cannot Be Compelled to Implead Stranger Against Wish Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The Court held that a third party claiming independent title cannot be added in a suit for specific performance as it would enlarge the scope of the suit.

17 Jul 2019

The appellant, Gurmit Singh Bhatia, purchased a suit property during the pendency of a suit for specific performance filed by the original plaintiffs ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Against Impleadment of Proprietor's Wife in Money Suit Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC. Plaintiff's Objection That No Cause of Action Was Pleaded Against Proposed Party Does Not Bar Impleadment When Presence Is Necessary for Effective Adjudication.

6 Jan 2026

The revision petitioner, K. Balasathiya Narayanan, filed a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application for Impleadment in Writ Petition Concerning Demolition of Building — Applicant Claims Ownership of Flat and Seeks to Protect Possession. The court held that the applicant has a direct interest in the property and should be heard before any order affecting his rights is passed.

13 Dec 2023

The judgment pertains to an interim application filed by Nagesh Madhava Suvarna seeking impleadment in a pending writ petition. The writ petition was ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment in Heirship Certificate Case — Claimant's Right Based on Sale Deed from Deceased Constitutes Sufficient Interest. Respondent No.2's Application Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Allowed as He Claims Ownership of Property Through Sale Deed Executed by Deceased Prakash Ausekar.

11 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Seema Prakash Ausekar, along with respondent nos. 3 to 5, filed Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 28/2021 before the Civil Judge Sen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Challenging Impleadment Order in Specific Performance Suit — Purchaser Pendente Lite Not a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Binds Transferee to Decree, Making Impleadment Unnecessary.

30 May 2013

The petitioner, Sri T.S. Mahadevaiah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 17.1.20...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Impleadment Order in Specific Performance Suit — Proposed Defendant Not a Necessary Party Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC. The court held that a person claiming to be a subsequent purchaser without any document of title cannot be impleaded in a suit for specific performance as it would change the nature of the suit.

9 Nov 2017

The petitioner, N. Jagannatha Reddy, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 17.04.2015 passe...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Co-Owner in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Co-Owner Held to be Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The court upheld the trial court's order allowing impleadment of a co-owner who allegedly obtained a trade licence by fraud, as his presence is essential for effective adjudication.

25 Mar 2014

The petitioners, Premanand Gajanan Naik and his wife Premila Premanand Naik, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 20.12.2013 passed by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Owner's Impleadment in Tenant's Suit Challenging Municipal Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act, 1888 — Owner Held Necessary Party as Decision Directly Affects Property Interest.

7 Mar 2018

The petitioner, M/s Mulraj Khatau and Sons Ltd., the owner of a suit property, filed a Chamber Summons under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Proc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Impleadment Application in Specific Performance Suit — No Right, Title or Interest in Suit Property at Time of Agreement. Subsequent purchaser/developer not entitled to be impleaded under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC as decree would bind them.

20 Sep 2013

The Bombay High Court dismissed a chamber summons filed by M/s Space Developer, a registered partnership firm, seeking impleadment as a party defendan...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)