Search Results for "original cash advance"

441 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 441 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Substitution of Assignee in Pending DRT Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act. Assignment of debt under Section 5 of SARFAESI Act entitles assignee to continue pending recovery proceedings without fresh filing, and amendment of cause title is permissible.

The petitioner, Alpha and Omega Diagnostics India Ltd., challenged a common order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which upheld the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Complainant in Cheque Bounce Case — Acquittal Upheld as Loan for Illegal Chit Fund Business Not Legally Enforceable. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Rebutted by Accused on Preponderance of Probabilities.

The appellant, Rajendra Pangam, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Paresh B. Naik, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit, Reduces Interest Rate from 23% to 6% p.a. for Money Lending Transactions. Court Held That Charging 23% Interest Was Unconscionable and Excessive Under Section 34 CPC, and Reduced It to 6% p.a. Simple Interest.

The plaintiff, G.R. Shet, proprietor of M/s Shet & Co., filed a suit for recovery of money against M/s Bawa Enterprises (a partnership firm) and its p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted; failure to show loan in income tax returns does not invalidate legally enforceable debt.

The appellant, Pushpa Sanchalal Kothari, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the acquitt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Photostat Copy Compared with Original is Admissible as Secondary Evidence Under Section 63 of Evidence Act, 1872. Section 11 of Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 Does Not Mandate Production of Licence to Maintain Suit.

The appellant, Shri M. Ratnavarma Padival, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in NI Act Case, Sets Aside Acquittal Based on Incorrect Application of Bombay Money Lenders Act. Court holds that mere filing of previous complaints does not prove money lending business without license under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Gulabrao Mahadeo Ghorpade, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Chandrakant Pandharinath Nehate, by the Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant failed to establish that the loan of Rs.3,00,000 was legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Arti Rajesh Karangutkar, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of respondent No.1, Anna Rocky Fernandes, by the Metropolitan Ma...