Search Results for "ongoing project"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "ongoing project"

286 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 286 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

18 Jun 2026

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.

8 Jun 2026

These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in RERA Refund Dispute — Joint Developer Not Liable for Refund of Amounts Not Received. The court held that under Sections 12 and 18 of RERA, only a promoter who has received payment can be directed to refund, and joint and several liability cannot be imposed without statutory basis.

26 Feb 2024

The case involves a dispute under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) regarding the refund of amounts paid by an allottee to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Interest Dispute — Interest on Delayed Possession to Run from 1 July 2016, Not 1 January 2020, But COVID Period Excluded from Interest Liability. The court held that the promoter is liable to pay interest from the date of default as per the agreement, but the COVID-19 pandemic period is excluded from interest liability.

23 Jan 2024

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. Pragatej Builders And Developers Pvt. Ltd. (the promoter) against a common judgment and order dated 7 Febr...

High Court

High Court Issues Directions in Slum Rehabilitation Writ Petitions; Expresses Grave Concern Over Alleged Fraud. No Final Verdict; Ongoing Investigation into Trafficking of Tenements and Non-Fixation of Transit Rent Under SRA Circular.

20 Jun 2023

The Bombay High Court issued a detailed common order in a batch of writ petitions filed by slum dwellers of the Kolekalyan Slum Rehabilitation Authori...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.

17 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Landowners' Appeals in Land Acquisition for Upper Krishna Project Rehabilitation Township. Acquisition of 1275 Acres for Rehabilitation of Displaced Persons Upheld as Public Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Judicial Review Under Article 226 Limited to Arbitrariness or Violation of Statute.

20 Jul 2022

The writ appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the common judgment and order dated 10.12.2021 passed b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Mar 2021

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)