Search Results for "office copy admissibility"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "office copy admissibility"

296 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 296 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Accused in Customs Smuggling Conspiracy Case — Statements Under Section 171-A of Sea Customs Act Held Admissible as Customs Officer is Not a Court. Office Copy of Insurance Premium Debit Note Admissible Under Section 114 Evidence Act and Appraiser's Valuation Evidence Not Hearsay, Convictions Upheld.

13 Aug 1969

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against convictions by the Presidency Magistrate, Bombay, as affirmed by the Bombay High Court, for conspirac...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Impounding Agreement of Sale Already Admitted in Evidence; Holds That Once Document Admitted Without Objection, Its Admissibility Cannot Be Challenged Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. The District Court's Revision Under Section 58 Was Maintainable Only by Court or Deputy Commissioner, Not by Private Party.

15 Dec 2022

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Trial Court directing impounding of an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Impounding of Document in Specific Performance Suit — No Objection Raised at Time of Exhibition. Court holds that once a document is exhibited without objection, it cannot be impounded under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 at a later stage.

29 Apr 2019

The petitioner, defendant No.4 in Special Civil Suit No.167 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 24.01.2019 passed by the 8th Jo...

Supreme Court

Secondary Evidence and Power of Attorney in Property Transactions: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 65 Evidence Act and Section 100 CPC i

6 Feb 2026

n Tharammel Peethambaran v. T. Ushakrishnan, the dispute arose from the sale of immovable property executed by the defendant acting as an alleged agen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Marking of Registered Sale Deeds as Exhibits Despite Denial of Contents — Evidentiary Value to be Decided at Trial. Execution of registered sale deeds admitted by defendant; trial court's refusal to mark them as exhibits set aside; documents to be marked and objections considered at final stage.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioner, as plaintiff, filed Regular Civil Suit No.41 of 2012 seeking declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction over two agricultural l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Marking of Registered Sale Deeds Despite Denial of Contents in Civil Suit — Evidentiary Value of Documents with Identification Number Clarified. The court held that marking a document with an identification number is a procedural step and does not amount to proof of its contents; the trial court erred in refusing to mark the sale deeds.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioner, as plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No.41 of 2012, sought a declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction against the respondent/de...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Impound Documents in Bank Recovery Suit — Stamp Duty Objection Must Be Raised at Time of Marking. Section 34 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 does not mandate impounding after documents are marked without objection; belated application cannot compel court to impound.

7 Mar 2014

The petitioner, defendant No.1 in a suit filed by Vijaya Bank for recovery of money, challenged the trial court's order dated 19.04.2012 declining to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Frames Question of Law on Admissibility of Original Evidence After Remand for Additional Evidence Under Section 391 CrPC. The court directed parties to address whether originally recorded evidence of Investigating Officer regarding omissions can be read after remand order under Section 391 CrPC.

27 Apr 2015

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, was hearing three connected criminal appeals: Criminal Appeal No. 348 of 2013 filed by the accused Ayush Nirmal P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Witness Summons Against Senior Advocate in Professional Communication Privilege Case. Communication Between Advocate and Client Held Privileged Under Section 126 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Cannot Be Compelled to Be Produced.

21 Dec 2022

The petitioner, a designated Senior Advocate of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Belated Production of Power of Attorney in Civil Suit. Foundational Pleadings Not Required at Production Stage; Trial Court's Discretion Upheld with Costs.

7 Nov 2019

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original deceased defendant no.1 in Special Civil Suit No.222/2009, challenged the trial court's order dated 29.07...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)