Search Results for "offence under Section 220"

368 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 368 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Accused No.7 in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice. Failure to Prove Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Leads to Setting Aside of Summoning Order.

The petitioner, Prasad S/o Veerayya Kulkarni, who was accused No.7 in C.C.No.790/2016 pending before the Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Nippani, filed a cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in House Trespass and Assault Case Due to Property Dispute and Lack of Preparation. Entry into shared ancestral house does not constitute house-trespass under Section 452 IPC when there is a long-standing property dispute and no evidence of preparation for hurt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of three accused persons (Babu Bhaga Zore, Sandeep Janardan Zore, and Dilip Janardan Zore) by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging MPID Act Application in NSEL Scam Case — Held That MPID Act Applies to NSEL as a Financial Establishment and That Default in Repayment of Deposits Attracts Offences Under the Act.

The judgment arises from multiple criminal appeals and interim applications filed by various parties, including directors, brokers, and financial inst...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Joint Trial of Two Cheque Dishonour Cases Under Section 219 CrPC — Same Accused, Same Transaction, Same Year. The court held that joint trial is permissible to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and conflicting judgments.

The petitioner, Puttanagouda, was being prosecuted in two separate cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, namely C.C. No.221...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in POCSO Case — State Appeal Against Inadequate Sentence Allowed. Court holds that Section 5(1) of POCSO Act mandates minimum sentence of ten years and trial court's imposition of less than ten years is illegal.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 377(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the inadequacy of the sentence imp...