Search Results for "offence involving moral turpitude"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "offence involving moral turpitude"

152 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 152 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Reinstatement of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Proceedings — Dismissal Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. The court held that the disciplinary authority failed to provide adequate opportunity to the employee to cross-examine witnesses and that the punishment of dismissal was disproportionate to the misconduct alleged.

4 Jun 2024

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by Vijaya Bank (the employer) against an order of a learned Single Judge dated 15.10.2003 in Writ Petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction to Consider Candidates with Criminal Cases for Police Constable Posts. Screening Committee Must Apply Mind to Nature of Offences and Acquittal Under Standing Order No.398/2010, Not Mechanically Reject Based on Criminal Involvement.

25 Aug 2021

The dispute arose from the rejection of candidates' applications for the post of Constable in Delhi Police due to their involvement in criminal cases,...

Supreme Court

Forfeiture of Gratuity – No Conviction Required for Moral Turpitude – Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Position. Termination for misconduct constituting an offence involving moral turpitude permits forfeiture of gratuity even without a criminal conviction.

17 Feb 2025

Conviction Not Necessary for Forfeiture – The Supreme Court overruled the earlier interpretation in C.G. Ajay Babu (2018), holding that Section 4(6)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Employee in MSRTC Case — Employer Cannot Suspend Without Considering Employee's Explanation. Suspension Order Set Aside as Charge-Sheet Was Issued Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing Under Standing Orders.

6 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Sachin Charlus Mirpagar, was employed as a Junior Assistant with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC). In 2006, he...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim Despite Dismissal for Moral Turpitude - Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Overrides Service Rules. The court held that Section 4(6) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 does not disentitle an employee from gratuity merely because of termination for misconduct involving moral turpitude.

9 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Parvez Shaikh, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 07.07.1983 and confirmed on 06.07.1985. In 1989, criminal offences under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Injunction Restraining Chairman and Managing Director from Functioning in Company Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favor grant of injunction as plaintiff failed to establish that defendant's appointment was invalid or that he was acting against company interests.

8 Feb 2016

The appellant, Sridhar Sundararajan, filed an appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 16th July 2015, which dismissed his Notice of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Passport Renewal for Accused in Criminal Cases — Directs Issuance Without Impounding Subject to Conditions. Mere pendency of criminal proceedings does not justify denial of passport renewal under Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, 1967, and the Passport Authority must consider the request independently, subject to conditions to secure the petitioner's presence during trial.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by individuals who were denied renewal of their passports by the Passport Authority on the gro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in POCSO Case — Probation Report Can Be Called Even Under POCSO Act. Section 4(1)(2) of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 is Not Barred by POCSO Act, 2012.

18 Jun 2018

The applicant, Nishant Harishchandra Salvi, was prosecuted for offences punishable under Section 354A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Review Petition in Gratuity Forfeiture Case — Petitioner's Termination for Misappropriation Does Not Automatically Forfeit Gratuity Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Court holds that forfeiture requires proof of loss caused by the employee's misconduct, and mere termination for misconduct is insufficient.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Laxman Balu Deualkar, was an ex-employee of the Kolhapur District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. He was chargesheeted for misappropriation o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bank's Cancellation of Candidature Due to Conviction Despite Probation. Section 12 of Probation of Offenders Act Does Not Override Disqualification Under Section 10(1)(b)(i) of Banking Regulations Act, 1949 for Conviction Involving Moral Turpitude.

22 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Amit Mohod, applied for a clerical post in the Bank of India. During the recruitment process, it was revealed that he had been convict...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)