Search Results for "notice under section 34(1)"

472 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 472 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Property Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature and Unwilling Complainant. Allegations Under Sections 341, 354C, 506 IPC Fail as Dispute is Civil and Complainant Refused to Make Judicial Statement.

The present appeal arises from a criminal case initiated by a complainant, who alleged that the appellant, restrained her from entering a property, cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Criminal Complaint Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 195 CrPC. Private Complaint Not Maintainable for Offences Under Sections 191-192 IPC Committed in Judicial Proceedings.

The case arises from two criminal complaints filed by M/s Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and another against Prasad Vassudev Keni and others under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Assault Case — Conviction Under Sections 324, 323, 341 IPC Read with Section 34 IPC Upheld. Court finds concurrent findings of fact based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, no grounds for interference in revision.

The criminal revision petition was filed by the petitioners/accused challenging the judgment dated 21.01.2011 passed by the II-Additional District and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Enhancement of Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Procedural Violation — High Court's Suo Motu Enhancement Without Notice Held Illegal. Enhancement of Sentence from 7 to 10 Years in Accused's Own Appeal Violates Section 386 Proviso CrPC and Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, Kumar Ghimirey, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act, 2012) under Section 9/10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions of Granite Dealer in VAT/CST Case — No Substantial Question of Law. Assessee failed to prove inter-State stock transfer; Tribunal's concurrent findings of fact upheld under Section 65(1) of KVAT Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s. Shanthakoti Enterprises, a dealer engaged in extraction and sale of rough granite blocks from quarries in Chamarajanagar, filed r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions of Granite Dealer in VAT Dispute — Inter-State Sale of Rough Granite Blocks Not Proven as Export Sale. Assessee failed to discharge burden of proof under Section 5(1) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

The petitioner, M/s. Shanthakoti Enterprises, a dealer engaged in extraction and sale of rough granite blocks from quarries in Chamarajanagar, filed r...