Search Results for "non-delivery"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Dealership Dispute Over Supply of Spurious Bearings and Non-Delivery. Court Upholds Termination for Breach of Implied Warranty of Genuineness but Remits Damages for Non-Delivery for Reconsideration.

The judgment concerns cross arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award arisin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Short Delivery in Multimodal Transport Due to Limitation Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. The court held that the suit filed beyond one year from delivery was time-barred and plaintiff failed to prove short delivery.

The plaintiff, M/s. Assobhai Bhanji and Sons, a registered partnership firm engaged in import and export of dairy and agro products, filed a suit agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Railway Non-Delivery Case Due to Invalid Notice Under Section 106 of Railways Act, 1989. Notice Served Beyond Six-Month Limitation Period and Addressed to Wrong Authority.

The appellant, M/s. Sapna Emporium, filed a first appeal against the judgment and order dated 22-09-1995 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bombay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitrator's Awards in Charterparty Dispute. Court Confirms That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach of Contract and Damages Are Not Open to Reappraisal Under Section 34.

The Petitioner, Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. (RCF), a public sector company, entered into an Agreement of Affreightment with the Respondent,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Exparte Arbitral Award for Lack of Notice Delivery Under Section 3 of Arbitration Act. Failure to Prove Service of Notice Violates Natural Justice and Renders Award Invalid.

The petitioner, Bindiya Ajay Chawla, was a co-borrower along with respondents 2 and 3 in a loan transaction with respondent No.1, Citifinancial Consum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Railway Claims Case — Claim for Non-Delivery of Onions Held Time-Barred Under Section 78B of Railways Act, 1890. Notice of Claim Given After Six Months from Date When Delivery Ought to Have Taken Place, Hence Claim Not Maintainable.

The appellant, Union of India, represented by the General Managers of Central and Northern Railways, appealed against the judgment and decree of the R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rejection of Plaint in Recovery Suit as Time-Barred Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Claim for Damages for Short Delivery of Goods Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period Under Article 11 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal was filed by Reliance Industries Limited against the order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel, dated 21/3/1998, rejecting the plai...