Search Results for "negotiable instrument"

245 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 245 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Summary Decree in Dishonoured Cheque Case — Interest at 18% p.a. under Section 80 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Cheque is an 'instrument' under Section 80, entitling payee to interest at 18% per annum from date of presentation.

The appeal arises from an order making a Summons for Judgment absolute and decreeing a suit for recovery of Rs.64,02,308/- with interest at 18% p.a. f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Applications Challenging Magistrate's Orders in Private Complaint Cases — Reiterates Limited Scope of Revision Against Interlocutory Orders Under Section 397 CrPC. Order Issuing Process Under Section 204 CrPC is Interlocutory and Not Subject to Revision.

The judgment involves multiple criminal applications filed before the Bombay High Court challenging orders passed by Magistrates issuing process again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Complainant Fails to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. Loan of Rs. 1,00,000 advanced by LIC agent to acquaintance not proved as legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The complainant-appellant, Sharanappa, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rejects Plaint in Money Recovery Suit - Applicant Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Succeeds -Plaintiff' Suit Barred by Maharashtra Money Lending Act Due to Unlicensed Lending

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard an interim application filed by the defendant under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Presumption Under Section 139 Rebutted by Accused Showing Loan Not Advanced.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Jagadish R, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The present criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner, Sri R. Rajappa, challenging the judgment of conviction and order on senten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Definition of Loan Under Maharashtra Money-Lending Act. Classification Between Interest-Free Advances and Loans at Interest Held Not Arbitrary Under Article 14.

The petitioner, Fauzan Shaikh, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of clauses (j) ...