Search Results for "mutual fund exemption"

58 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Stay of Demand for Slum Rehabilitation Authority in Income Tax Exemption Case — Prima Facie Case Established for Section 11 Exemption Despite Section 2(15) Proviso. Statutory Authority's Non-Profit Slum Rehabilitation Activities Held Charitable, Not Commercial.

The Petitioner, Slum Rehabilitation Authority, a statutory body established under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance Under Section 14A and Capital Expenditure on Bridge Construction. Tribunal's findings that no expenditure was incurred for earning dividend income and that bridge contribution was revenue expenditure upheld.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji Bench, which had partly a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment and Stay Rejection in Income Tax Case — Violation of Natural Justice and CBDT Circular. Petitioner's Bank Accounts Attached Without Prior Hearing; Court Directs Restoration of Status Quo Pending Appeal.

The petitioner, Milestone Real Estate Fund, a real estate fund, challenged the provisional attachment of its assets under Section 281B of the Income T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Recovery Order Against State Agency for Exceeding 20% Limit Under Section 220(6) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Recovery of Rs.16,95,48,869/- for multiple assessment years held illegal as it exceeded the statutory limit of 20% pending appeal.

The petitioner, Bidar Nirmiti Kendra, an agency of the State Government, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices for Non-Resident Taxpayer Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Satisfaction. Section 148 notices under Income Tax Act, 1961 set aside as Assessing Officer failed to record reasons and obtain sanction before issuing notices beyond four years.

The petitioner, a non-resident Indian residing in Dubai, was regularly assessed to tax in India on income accruing or arising in India. He had investe...