Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka Decides Regular First Appeal in a Partition, Declaration and Injunction Suit. The Court Allows or Dismisses the Appeal Based on the Merits of the Case.
29 Jun 2026...
Search Results for "motive immaterial"
258 result(s) found
Found 258 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Workman's Appeal Against Dismissal of Compensation Claim on Ground of Territorial Jurisdiction; Holds Objection Requires Prejudice Under Employees' Compensation Act, 1923. The Court ruled that Section 21 of the Act is a beneficial provision and the Commissioner should not have rejected the claim on hyper-technical grounds.
29 Aug 2018The appeal arose from the dismissal of a workman's claim for compensation by the Commissioner for Employees Compensation, Latur, on the ground of lack...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Sales Tax Assessment on Inter-State Movement of Brahmos Missiles for Job Work. The Court Examines Whether Transfer of Goods for Warhead Integration Constitutes Inter-State Sale Under Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
10 Jan 2017The judgment, though incomplete in its provided excerpt, deals with a writ petition filed by BrahMos Aerospace Private Limited, a joint venture betwee...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence; Judgment Text Incomplete as to Verdict. Accused Convicted Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC for Throwing Wife and Child into Well, Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Testimony.
2 Aug 2017The appellant, Sambhaji Kachru Kolhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code fo...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to MSRTC Circular Requiring Heavy Vehicle Driving License for Driver-cum-Conductor Posts. Court Holds That Prescribing Higher Qualification for Driving Heavy Passenger Vehicles Is a Reasonable Condition Based on Public Safety and Operational Necessity, Not Arbitrary.
4 Oct 2017The petitioner, Maharashtra S. T. Workers Congress (INTUC), a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under Art...
- 94
High Court
Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Hired Car Driver Stabbing Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court held that the last seen theory, recovery of weapon, and motive established the guilt of the accused under Section 302 IPC.
9 Mar 2026The appellant, Sandipkumar Sureshbhai Patel, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Mazharkhan Saidkhan Pathan, a driver of an Innova c...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Doubt — Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances consistent only with guilt.
22 Dec 2021The appellant, Gangubai Kashinath Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 365/1994 for the murder of her hu...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Forgery in Land Dispute Case. Appellant convicted under Sections 302, 201, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC for murdering landowner and forging power of attorney to transfer property.
8 Dec 2020The appellant, Tanaji Maruti Kolekar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of Kasturabai Tonape and for offences of...
- 63
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
9 Jul 2026The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 179/2014, convicting ...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.
10 May 2019The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...
- 312
