Search Results for "missing baby"

44 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Charges Against Doctor in POCSO Case for Failure to Report Sexual Offence — Mandatory Reporting Duty Under Section 19 of POCSO Act Applies Only to Persons Having 'Reason to Believe' Based on Concrete Information, Not Mere Suspicion.

The petitioner, Dr. Lata Krishnaraddi Mankali, a gynecologist and Chief Medical Officer at KLE's Society's Dr. Kamala Hospital, Ankola, was arrayed as...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition by Father for Custody of Minor Daughter from Mother — Custody Dispute Between Parents Not Maintainable as Habeas Corpus When Child is in Mother's Custody and Not Illegally Detained.

The petitioner, Gaurav Raj Jain, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Berry Fruit Quarrel Murder Case. Sudden Fight Without Premeditation Attracts Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, Reducing Offence from Murder to Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder Under Section 304 Part I IPC.

The appellant, Avinash Datta Chavhan, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pusad in Sessions Trial No. 11/2017 for offences under Sections 304 and 506...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ranjit S Kadam, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Shital, a neighbor, and sentenced to l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Ten-Year Rigorous Imprisonment Affirmed. Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault Despite Delay in FIR.

The appellant, Amol S/o Raju Nindekar, was convicted by the Special Court, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Juvenile Board's Decision to Try Older Juvenile as Adult in Murder Case — Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 Requires Individualized Assessment of Physical and Mental Capacity to Commit Offence.

The case involves two juveniles, aged 17.5 years and 16.5 years, accused of murdering a three-and-half-year-old child. The Juvenile Justice Board, aft...