Search Results for "minor landowner"

54 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Fresh Acquisition Under 2013 Act Where Land Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation. Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 1894 Act Deemed Lapsed as Award Not Declared and Possession Not Taken, Violating Article 300-A Right to Property.

The petitioner, Roshan Shrikant Tandel, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the acquisition proceedings concerning his land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Legal Representatives Permitted to Add Alternative Prayer for Refund of Advance. Pre-trial amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC is to be liberally allowed if it does not cause irreparable prejudice to the opposite party.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased plaintiff Chintamani Madhav Joshi, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners to Use Reserved Land for Adjacent Purposes After Lapse of Reservation Period Under MRTP Act. Reservation for shopping complex and vegetable market lapses due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, landowners of Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza Gondia (Bk), challenged the reservation No. S169 in the Final D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tenancy Declarations and Sale of Agricultural Properties Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to orders from 1988-1996 under Goa Tenancy Act fails as petition filed in 2013 is grossly delayed without explanation.

The petitioner, Rashid Salvador Sousa, filed a writ petition in April 2013 under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution before the High Court of Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...