Search Results for "material representation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "material representation"

3859 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3859 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation — Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated. The court held that a delay of about 82 days in deciding the detenu's representation without any explanation vitiates the detention order under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords Bootleggers Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

24 Aug 2005

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Mohammed Taki Ahmed Ali Chunara @ Mohammed Islam Mohammed Ali Shaikh, challenged the detention order passed by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Due to Untruthful Translation of Grounds in Preventive Detention Case. Failure to Furnish Correct Marathi Translation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

15 Mar 2005

The petitioner, father of the detenu Shanidas Parshuram Mhatre, challenged the detention order dated 8.10.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Police, T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Grounds in Tamil Language — Right to Make Effective Representation Violated Under Article 22(5) of Constitution of India. The court held that failure to provide grounds of detention in a language understood by the illiterate Tamil-speaking detenu infringed his constitutional right to make an effective representation, rendering the detention illegal.

19 Oct 2006

The petitioner, Anna Durai @ Dilli Ganpati Devendra, an illiterate Tamil-speaking person residing in Mumbai, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Rampant Illegal Hoardings by Political and Religious Entities Across Maharashtra. Court Interprets Definition of Skysign and Requirement of Written Permission Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

31 Jan 2017

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay was seized with a group of Public Interest Litigations and Writ Petitions raising serious concerns regarding th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation — Right Under Article 22(5) Violated. The Court held that the 60-day delay in considering the detenue's representation by the Central Government was unexplained and vitiated the detention order.

15 May 2023

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against a preventive detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Representation to Advisory Board. Failure to Forward Detenu's Representation to Advisory Board Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 10 of MPDA Act.

6 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Rupesh Ram Thakur, challenged an order of detention dated 17 October 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dang...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPD Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Unexplained Delay of Over 30 Days in Deciding Representation Violates Fundamental Right Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

24 Jun 2014

The petitioner, Ajay Suresh Alande, brother of the detenu Chetan Suresh Alande, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the detention order dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 13 Days in Deciding Detenu's Representation Violates Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5) and Section 8(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

17 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Vinod Dhannulal Jaiswal, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad (respondent No.1) u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unreasonable Delay in Considering Representation. Unexplained Delay of 25 Days in Deciding Representation Renders Detention Illegal Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

22 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Mr. Rizwan @ Tippu Sattar Pathan, challenged an order of detention dated 5th May 2014 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Pre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Illegible Documents and Lack of Marathi Translation. Preventive Detention Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution When Grounds Not Communicated Effectively.

25 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Rahul Ambadas Jadhav, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)