Search Results for "male victim"

464 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 464 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape of Minor Child Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC. Seven-Year-Old Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Dilip Bharat Gavand @ Kanwa, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the offence of rape under Section 376(2)(f) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Inconsistency and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f)(l) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as DNA report excluded semen and blood of accused, and victim's testimony was tutored.

The appellant, Bhaiyya S/o Vijay Chakre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Achalpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(l) of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Inconsistencies and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(m) IPC and Section 6 read with 5 of POCSO Act set aside as medical evidence contradicted prosecution story and testimony of victim and mother had contradictions.

The appellant, Rajesh S/o Rajan Nair, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shahada, for offences under Section 376(2)(m) of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC — Penetration Established by Medical Evidence. The court held that slight penetration is sufficient for rape and the medical evidence corroborated the victim's testimony.

The appellant, Mohammed Gaus Ibrahim Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the offence of rape under Section 376...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Three Minor Girls Under POCSO Act and IPC. Life imprisonment confirmed for repeated sexual assault on children aged 5-7 years, with court finding testimony of victims credible and corroborated by medical evidence.

The appellant, Kamlesh Janardhan Walde, was convicted by the Special Judge in Special Criminal (Child) Case No.33/2016 for offences under Section 376(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act, 2012 set aside as medical evidence did not support penetration and delay in FIR was unexplained.

The appellant, Ganesh Kisan Navale, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) for sex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Prostitution Case Due to Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A IPC and Section 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act set aside as sole testimony of victim was uncorroborated and unreliable.

The appellant, Mrs. Amina @ Saniya M. Shakil Shaikh, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under Sections 363, 366A rea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Ten-Year Rigorous Imprisonment Affirmed. Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault Despite Delay in FIR.

The appellant, Amol S/o Raju Nindekar, was convicted by the Special Court, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) of the Indian Penal Cod...