Search Results for "licensing regulations"

191 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 191 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Customs Show Cause Notice for Alleged Misdeclaration of Imported Goods. Court holds that disputed questions of fact regarding valuation and classification cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Globotrans Prologistix Pvt. Ltd. and Naim Shaikh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Restrains State from Conducting Surprise Inspections of Private Health Institutions Without Prior Notice. Mandamus issued to enforce compliance with Section 10 of the Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act, 2007 requiring 15-day notice before inspection.

The Karnataka State Private Management Association of Health Institutions and the Karnataka State Association of the Management of Nursing and Allied ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Transmission Licence Without TBCB in HVDC Project. Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 is an alternative route; regulatory commission has discretion to adopt regulated tariff mechanism for transmission projects.

The case involves a challenge by Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (TPC-T) against the grant of a transmission licence by the Maharashtra Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Office Note Requiring Courier Companies' Authorized Signatories to Hold 'F' Card, 'G' Card or Kardex Number and Pass Examinations Under CHALR 2004. Courier Regulations Not Exempt from Customs Broker Licensing Requirements Under CHALR 2004/CBLR 2013.

The Couriers Association of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging an Off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prohibitory Order Under Regulation 21 of CHALR, 2004 — No Appeal Lies to CESTAT. Regulation 22(8) of CHALR, 2004 is Not Ultra Vires the Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal arises from a decision of the CESTAT dated 2 January 2013, which held that an appeal is not maintainable against an order passed under Regu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Eating House License for Violation of Natural Justice. Licensee Not Present During Alleged Obscene Acts; Suspension Without Notice and Hearing Set Aside Under Bombay Police Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Ramarai Rammilan Rai, was a co-licensee of an eating house known as 'Missile Restaurant and Bar' in Goregaon, Mumbai, holding a licens...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Licensing Authorities for Erroneous Licence Leading to 20 Years of Litigation. Petitioner Firm Penalised for Lapses of Licensing Authorities; Court Grants Relief Based on Fair Admission by Respondents.

The petitioner, M/s. General Instruments Co., a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed a writ petition in the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Public Interest Litigation on Unregulated Stem Cell Therapies for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Court Examines Legality Under Drugs Act and Lays Down Permissibility of Such Therapies in Clinical Trial Settings Only.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Yash Charitable Trust and others before the Supreme Court, raising concerns about the rampant promotion a...