Search Results for "lease policy"

370 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 370 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision Setting Aside NCLT Orders Approving Resolution Plans for Earth Infrastructures Limited. Dispute Involves GNIDA's Claim Over Land Leased to Special Purpose Company and Its Subsidiaries, and the Validity of Resolution Plans Under IBC.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 30.01.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows SIPCOT's Appeal in Sub-Leasing Dispute — Demand for Sub-Leasing Charges Upheld. Lease Agreement Clause 2(vii) Prohibiting Sub-Leasing Without Consent and Requiring Payment of Charges is Valid and Enforceable.

The case involves two writ appeals filed by State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (SIPCOT) against orders of a learned Single J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Airport Authority's Demand for Vacant Possession of Premises. Lease Agreement for Flying Club Premises at Juhu Aerodrome Terminated Due to Non-Payment of Rent and Unauthorized Subletting.

The petitioners, M/s. Bombay Flying Club and its Honorary Secretary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Lease Extension for Tourist Resort Based on Legitimate Expectation. No Right to Renewal Exists Under Lease Agreement or Policy, and Doctrine of Legitimate Expectation Cannot Override Statutory Tender Process.

The petitioner, Sugati Beach Resort Pvt. Ltd., had entered into a lease agreement with the President of India through the Union Territory Administrati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's rejection of claim for extension of lease, finding no error of law or jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Prajapati Gunvant Keshavlal, was engaged in loading and unloading goods from railway wagons. On 11th June 2009, the respondent, Union ...