Search Results for "laboratory attendant"

86 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Laboratory Attendants Against Premature Retirement. Class IV/Group D Employees Entitled to Retirement at Age 60 Under Rule 10.2 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Laboratory Attendants (Samadhan Umak and Maroti Dhote) employed with Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krishi V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer to Hold Fresh Enquiry After Termination Set Aside for Breach of Natural Justice. Reinstatement Ordered but Back wages Made Dependent on Outcome of Fresh Enquiry.

The petitioner, Sanjeevan Gramin Vaidyakiya & Samajik Sahayata Pratisthan, challenged an order dated 23.12.2011 passed by the learned Presiding Office...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Approval for Lab Attendant Appointment in Minority School. Education Officer's order set aside for non-application of mind and failure to consider minority status under Article 30(1) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Mohammadiya Education Society's Maulana Azad Urdu Girls High School (Petitioner No.1) and Shaikh Tausif Ahmad Abdul Samim (Petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Daily Wager by Counting Pre-Regularization Service as Qualifying Service Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Continuous Service of Same Nature from 1971 to 2003 Entitles Petitioner to Pension Despite Initial Daily Wage Engagement.

The petitioner, Sayyad Abbas Sayyad Usman, was employed as a watchman/Choukidar on a daily wage basis with the respondents (Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Kru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Writ Petition Challenging Termination for Unauthorized Absence and Misconduct. School Tribunal's order upheld as inquiry was fair and punishment proportionate under MEPS Act.

The petitioner, Abdul Shakil Shakil Ahamad, was employed as a Peon in 1989 and later promoted to Junior Clerk. He alleged that he was paid a meager co...