Search Results for "junior drawing higher pay"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Pay Anomaly Case - Stepping Up of Pay Not Permissible Under FR 22 When Junior's Higher Pay Is Due to ACP Scheme, Not Promotion. The Court held that FR 22 does not apply when the junior's higher pay is due to ACP upgradation, which is not a promotion.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against a judgment of the Karnataka High Court, which had allowed writ petitions filed by two employ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Filed by Union of India Challenging Central Administrative Tribunal Orders in Service Matters. The Petitions Involve Defence Civilian Employees and Orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal.

The provided judgment text is limited to the case title and party names. No substantive content regarding the facts, issues, arguments, or decision of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010115872016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Drivers' Petition for Time Bound Promotion Scheme Benefits. Government Resolution dated 17.5.2003 Quashed as Discriminatory Against Drivers in Zilla Parishads.

The petitioners, four drivers employed by Zilla Parishads in Gadchiroli, Amravati, and Chandrapur, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of Governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Re-fixation of Pay for Retired District Judge from Date of Promotion with Interest. Petitioner entitled to pay re-fixation from promotion date and junior's promotion dates with 6% interest on delayed arrears.

The petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking re-fixation of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Re-fixation of Pay for Retired District Judge from Date of Promotion with Interest. Petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, entitled to re-fixation of basic pay from promotion date and interest on delayed payment under Article 226.

The petitioner, a retired District and Sessions Judge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking re-fixation of his...