Search Results for "judicial integrity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "judicial integrity"

555 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 555 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Dismissal of Bank Manager in Disciplinary Proceeding — Penalty Disproportionate to Misconduct Where No Loss Caused to Bank. Employer Must Consider Nature and Gravity of Charges and Unblemished Service Record Before Imposing Major Penalty.

5 May 2026

The petitioner, Kishor Gopichand Ukey, was a Manager with the Central Bank of India. He was served with a charge-sheet containing eight charges in a d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union and State in Consumer Protection Rules Challenge, Reversing High Court's Striking Down of Qualification and Procedure Provisions. Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9) of Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 Found Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as They Provide Sufficient Guidelines for Appointments to Consumer Commissions.

3 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Union of India, and State of Maharashtra against a common judgment and order ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Judicial Officer for Misconduct in Land Acquisition Cases — Gross Judicial Indiscipline and Extraneous Considerations Proven. The court held that deliberate errors in judicial orders amounting to misconduct are not protected by judicial immunity, and dismissal is proportionate for such grave misconduct.

6 Mar 2020

The appellant, Sadhna Chaudhary, was a judicial officer in the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Services. She was dismissed from service following discip...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officers in Public Interest — Screening Committee's Evaluation Not Arbitrary or Perverse. Rule 74(b)(ii) of Jharkhand Service Code, 2001, allows compulsory retirement after 30 years of service or 50 years of age in public interest; court found no mala fides or perversity in the decision.

27 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by erstwhile judicial officers of Jharkhand challenging their compulsory retirement under Rule 74...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Internal Enquiry Report Not Shared With Contractor Before Imposing Business Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable.

8 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by respondent No.2, Oil and N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires a subjective satisfaction based on relevant material, and mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings or adverse entries without a review committee recommendation cannot sustain the order.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Judicial Officer Challenging Compulsory Retirement. Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks in ACRs Violates Natural Justice, Order Set Aside.

8 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Shraddha Vinod Deo, was appointed as a Judicial Magistrate First Class on 1st September 1990 and served at various places includi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Non-Appointment as CESTAT Member — Selection Committee Recommendation Not Binding on Appointing Authority. The court held that the petitioner had no right to appointment based solely on the recommendation of the Selection Committee, and the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (A.C.C.) was entitled to withhold approval.

22 Aug 2006

The petitioner, Ramesh Motiram Ramchandani, a Commissioner (Appeals-I) in Customs & Central Excise, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Port Trust's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal Award Setting Aside Disciplinary Enquiry. Enquiry Found Vitiated Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Perverse Findings Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

2 Feb 2005

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai (Petitioner) challenged an award dated 18th May, 1999 passed by the Presiding Officer of the Central Gover...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)