Search Results for "investors action group"

105 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 105 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging SEBI's Ex-Parte Interim Order in Securities Market Manipulation Case. Court upholds SEBI's power to issue ex-parte interim directions under Section 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 to protect market integrity.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Hemant Kulshrestha and Vinay Bansal challenging an ex-parte interim order passed by the Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs SEBI to Liquidate Attached Assets and Refund Investors in Collective Investment Scheme Case — Court Emphasizes Need for Time-Bound Disposal and Coordination Between Authorities

The petitioners, who are husband, wife, and their son, were founder-directors of Sai Prasad Properties Ltd and other companies in the Sai Group. They ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Favor of Appellants in Commercial Suits Involving Secured Creditors. Appointment of receiver without notice and without considering secured creditors' rights under SARFAESI Act is unsustainable.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by Future Corporate Resources Pvt Ltd and Ojas Tradelease And Mall Management Pvt Ltd against or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to SEBI Special Court's Rejection of Compounding Application Under Section 24A of SEBI Act. Writ Petition Filed Against Order Denying Compounding of Offence Under Section 24(2) for Non-Payment of Penalty Without SEBI Consent.

The case involved a criminal writ petition filed by N.H. Securities Ltd. and its directors seeking to quash an order of the SEBI Special Court that ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals by Authority for Advance Rulings Against High Court Judgment Quashing AAR's Rejection of Treaty Benefits. Questions Raised on Taxation of Capital Gains Under India-Mauritius DTAA and Scope of Section 245R(2) Proviso (iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The disputes arose from applications for advance ruling filed by three Mauritius-incorporated companies—Tiger Global International II Holdings, Tige...