Search Results for "insult"

673 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 673 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes SC/ST Act Charges Against Accused in Private Altercation — Insult Not in Public View. Alleged Caste-Based Insult Occurred Inside a Shop, Not in Public View, Failing to Attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, Bhimappa Jantakal @ Bhimanna and three others, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred Inside a Shop, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellant, Pinakinbhai Ravindrakumar Shukla, was convicted by the learned Additional District Judge and Presiding Officer, 2nd Fast Track Court, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, 24 individuals, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Alleged Caste-Based Insults Occurred Inside Police Station, Not in Public View, Failing to Attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, ten individuals, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR No. 0154 of 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Alleged Caste-Based Insult in Private Setting Does Not Attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The applicants, Tukaram s/o Bhagwan Sawant and Saraswati w/o Tukaram Sawant, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Flag Code Violation Case — Non-compliance of Flag Code Does Not Constitute Offence Under Prevention of Insult to National Honours Act, 1971. Headmaster's act of flying flag beyond sunset not an insult to national honour, as Flag Code is directory and not mandatory.

The applicant, Umesh Chopde, was the Headmaster of a school in Akot, Maharashtra. A police constable (non-applicant No.2) allegedly found the national...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View and Inconsistent Evidence. Casteist Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Compound, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The case arises from an incident on 02.11.2001 at about 10:00 hrs, where the appellants, employees of Mangrol Nagarpalika, allegedly broke a motor sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Charges Under SC/ST Act for Lack of Caste-Based Insult and Public View Requirement. Allegations of Land Dispute Do Not Attract Section 3(1)(r) of SC/ST Act as Insult Not on Account of Caste and Incident Occurred Inside Building Not in Public View.

The appellant, Hitesh Verma, challenged the order of the High Court of Uttarakhand dismissing his petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, six individuals, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR No. 86 of 2017...