Search Results for "input service"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "input service"

139 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Appellant Entitled to Cenvat Credit on Input Services. Definition of 'Input Service' Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is Broad and Includes Services Having Nexus with Manufacturing Business.

21 Apr 2021

The appellant, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, is a manufacturer of motor vehicles and parts, registered under the Central Excise Act. It file...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes NAA Order Against McDonald's Franchisee in GST Anti-Profiteering Case — Failure to Consider Input Tax Credit Benefit and Lack of Proper Investigation. The court held that the National Anti-Profiteering Authority must consider the benefit of input tax credit and conduct a proper investigation before directing deposit of profiteered amount under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

1 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd., operates McDonald's restaurants in Western and Southern India. After the GST rate on restaurant serv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Accumulated Input Tax Credit Under Inverted Duty Structure in GST — Rejection by Authorities Set Aside. Held that refund of unutilized ITC is admissible under Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act, 2017 even when output supply is partially exempt, and that the formula under Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 must be applied correctly.

23 Apr 2026

The petitioner, CHEC-TPL Line 4 Joint Venture, a joint venture between TATA Projects Limited and another entity, was engaged in the construction of a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBEC Circular on Brand Rate of Drawback. Court holds that an exporter can claim Brand Rate of drawback under Rule 7 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995 even after availing All Industry Rate under Rule 3.

1 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Alfa Laval (India) Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Circular dated 30th Decemb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

10 Sep 2015

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Mutual Fund Against Sales Tax Reassessment Orders — Holds Mutual Fund Not a Dealer Under MVAT Act, 2002. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond Limitation Period and Without Proper Sanction Are Invalid.

6 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Axis Mutual Fund, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging several orders passed by the sales ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Raymond Limited's Appeals in Central Excise Cenvat Credit Dispute. Cenvat Credit of AED (T&TA) on Inputs Can Be Utilized for Payment of BED on Final Products.

5 Mar 2015

The appellant, Raymond Limited, is a company manufacturing blankets from woollen fibres. The blankets attract only Basic Excise Duty (BED) and not Add...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Cancellation Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Registration Cancelled Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing, Set Aside with Restoration.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Rawman Metal & Alloys, a proprietorship concern, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)