Search Results for "input reversal"

23 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes GST Demand Order for Violation of Natural Justice — Personal Hearing Not Granted Despite Reminders Under Section 75(5) of GST Act. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing Before Confirming ITC Reversal Demand Renders Order Invalid; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication.

The petitioner, Aarti Enterprise through Savitaben Brindavan Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging a system-based notice in Form DRC-01A dated 09...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MODVAT Credit Denial Under Rule 57C of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exempted Final Products Not Eligible for Credit.

The petitioners, Atlas Automotive Components Private Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Orders Bank to Refund Rs. 76.9 Lakhs in Unauthorized Transaction Case. Judgment Reinforces Zero Liability for Customers Reporting Unauthorized Transactions Promptly

In a case involving unauthorized electronic banking transactions, the court ruled that the bank (Respondent No. 2) must refund Rs. 76,90,017/- to Phar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cenvat Credit Interest Dispute — Reversal Without Utilization Does Not Attract Interest. Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 interpreted to require actual utilization for interest liability.

The appellant, Cipla Limited, a manufacturer of medicaments, was engaged in the manufacture of medicaments containing ethanol (alcohol) which fell out...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Petition Against Rebate Claim on Exported Inputs/Capital Goods. Reversal of Cenvat Credit Does Not Constitute Payment of Duty for Rebate Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary to the Government of India dated 4 June 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition challenging Show Cause Notice for input tax credit reversal due to non-electronic filing of Form GST ITC-02 caused by GST portal functionality issues.

The Bombay High Court quashed the show cause notice issued to Tikona Infinet Private Limited, which alleged wrongful availing of ITC due to non-electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on CENVAT Credit Restriction for Inputs from 100% EOU. Rule 3(6)(a)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 restricts credit on inputs manufactured by a 100% EOU, and reversal under Rule 3(4) does not remove the restriction.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs, Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...