Search Results for "industrial relations policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "industrial relations policy"

195 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 195 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Interim Relief Order in Industrial Dispute — Tribunal Directed to Reconsider Without Prejudging Merits. Industrial Court's Order Granting Rs.3,500 Per Month to Workmen Set Aside for Lack of Consideration of Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Under Section 10(3) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd. (HUL), challenged an order dated 15/04/2011 passed by the Industrial Court, Akola Bench, in Reference (BIR) No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Municipal Council's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award on Permanency and Equal Pay. Court Upholds Permanency for Workmen Completing 180 Days and Daily Wage Calculation at 1/26th of Monthly Salary Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

31 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Shrirampur Municipal Council, a local body constituted under the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats & Industrial Townshi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Order Declaring Transfer of Employees as Illegal Change Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Transfer from Polyester Department to Spurn Yarn Department Without Notice of Change Violates Section 42 Read with Schedule II Items 1,2,4,5 of BIR Act.

5 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 5 December 2006 passed by the Labour Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer’s Writ Petition Against Industrial Court’s Direction to Absorb Employees as Canal Inspectors – Findings of Unfair Labour Practice under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 Upheld. Direction to absorb employees on the post of Canal Inspector from the date of complaint was based on evidence that employees had completed training, passed departmental examination, and were actually performing duties of the higher post, with employer failing to act despite available vacancies.

9 Jan 2006

The writ petition was filed by the State Government and its officers challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, which had declared that the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules on Maintainability of Unfair Labour Practice Complaint under MRTU & PULP Act. Direct Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Industrial Court Can Assume Jurisdiction.

26 Jul 2006

Mahindra & Mahindra Limited filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Industrial Court which had dismissed its a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal Award Declaring Closure Illegal in Industrial Disputes Act Case — Re-employment and Backwages Granted to Retrenched Workmen. Closure of Factory Without Prior Permission Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal as Establishment Employed More Than 100 Workmen.

13 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Global Health Care Products, a registered partnership firm manufacturing toothpaste in Dapada, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, closed its fact...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition Challenging Government's Refusal to Refer Industrial Dispute Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Appropriate Government Exceeded Its Power by Delving into Merits and Considering Irrelevant Factors Such as Acceptance of Retrenchment Compensation by Some Workmen.

27 Jan 2020

The petitioner, United Mine Workers Union, challenged the communication dated 3rd September 2019 issued by the Union of India (Ministry of Labour and ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Temporary Employees in Unfair Labour Practice Case Due to Erroneous Dismissal by Industrial Court. Industrial Court's Decision Quashed as It Failed to Consider Admissions and Merits Under Items 5, 6, 9, and 10 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

5 Mar 2026

The dispute involved multiple writ petitions filed by temporary employees against the Respondent, challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of thei...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

31 Mar 2012

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)