Search Results for "inadvertent fixation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "inadvertent fixation"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Partially Allows Petition in Service Law Dispute Regarding Suspension Period Treatment. Court holds that acquittal does not automatically entitle full backwages during suspension, but directs treatment of suspension period as duty for qualifying service and pension purposes under Regulation 75 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation (Service) Regulations, 1989.

25 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a petition filed by a former employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) seeking a direction to treat his susp...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Agricultural Officer for Excess Pension Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Prolonged Delay. Recovery of Inadvertently Paid Excess Pension Without Misrepresentation or Fraud Held Impermissible Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

21 Mar 2025

The petitioner, a former Agricultural Officer, retired on 30.04.2014 and was receiving a monthly pension of Rs.43,921 under PPO No.RO-713261. The resp...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute: Admission in Unconnected Case Not Clear, Unambiguous, or Unequivocal Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. Court Holds That a Statement Made in Cross-Examination in Another Case, Where the Tenant Admitted Tenancy Was in His Mother's Name, Does Not Constitute a Valid Admission for Summary Judgment Without Trial.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court, which had decreed eviction of the appellants (tenants) from a pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits Under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 — Petitioner Entitled to Pension as per Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Held that the post of Superintendent, Legal Aid Cell is a civil post and the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Bhaskar s/o Niwartirao Jadhav, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking pensionary benefits for h...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Additional Affidavit in Cheque Dishonour Case — Rejects Hyper-Technical Approach. The court held that when documents are already permitted to be produced, an application to file an additional affidavit to prove them should be allowed to ensure a fair trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

7 Apr 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Jagdale Mirch Masala Products (India), filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Barring Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Error. Employer Cannot Recover Excess Payment When Employee Did Not Misrepresent and Recovery Would Cause Hardship.

13 Jun 2006

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India and others against an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) which directed the petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Date of Birth Dispute Resolved in Favour of Workman. The court held that the petitioner-hospital had resorted to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act by not accepting the corrected date of birth of the workman.

28 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Tata Memorial Centre, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act and a public trust under the administrative control of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Condonation of Delay by Karnataka Housing Board under Limitation Act. High Court's Order Condoning 3966-Day Delay in Filing Second Appeal is Scrutinized on Grounds of State Lethargy and Sufficient Cause.

1 Jan 1970

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka condoning a delay of 3966 days in filing a second appeal by t...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)