Search Results for "in-camera witnesses"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "in-camera witnesses"

70 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Maharashtra Police Act for Lack of Material Showing Petitioner as Dangerous Person. Externment Based on Stale Criminal Cases and Acquittals Does Not Satisfy Requirements of Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

24 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Ajij Babu Khan Pathan, challenged an externment order passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jalgaon, under Section 56(1)(a) and (b)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Externment Orders Under Maharashtra Police Act — Clarifies Conditions for Section 56(1)(a) and (b) and Requirement of Witness Fear. The court held that each clause has distinct requirements and the authority must apply mind to proportionality and natural justice.

8 Feb 2019

The judgment concerns three criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of the Maharashtra Police Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Externment Orders Under Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 — Emphasizes Need for Application of Mind and Compliance with Audi Alteram Partem. Court Holds That Externment Orders Must Be Based on Subjective Satisfaction of the Authority and Not Be Excessive or Arbitrary.

8 Feb 2019

The judgment arises from three criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Single Robbery Incident — Preventive Detention Not Warranted When Ordinary Criminal Law is Sufficient. The court held that a solitary incident of robbery simplicitor cannot form the basis for branding a person as a 'dangerous person' under Section 3 of the MPDA Act, 1981, and the detention order was passed mechanically without application of mind.

19 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Sagar @ Lalu Bhoju Rathod, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of 'Public Order' Impact — Definition of 'Dangerous Weapon' Held Unconstitutionally Vague. The court held that mere possession of a weapon without evidence of public disturbance cannot justify preventive detention under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

11 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Iqbal Munnaf Sayyed, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA) by an orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MCOCA Case for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Satisfying Material. Preventive Detention under Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider vital documents and the subjective satisfaction was based on irrelevant material.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Shaikh Hafiz Shaikh Yusuf, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA) by an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Non-Disclosure of In-Camera Statements in Show Cause Notice — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice under Maharashtra Police Act. The Court held that failure to disclose substance of in-camera statements in show cause notice vitiates externment order as it deprives noticee of opportunity to meet the case.

25 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Sayyed Jafar Sayyed Nasir, challenged an externment order dated 23.6.2016 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Amravati City, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Wrongful Preventive Detention Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 — Detention Order Invalid for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction Regarding Public Order. The court held that the absence of subjective satisfaction in the detention order rendered it invalid, entitling the petitioner to compensation for the period of detention.

13 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Yuvraj Ramchandra Pawar, was detained under an order dated 2nd December 2013 passed by the District Magistrate, Satara, under Section ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Section 56(1)(b) of Bombay Police Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Excessive Territorial Extent. Petitioner Externed from Pune City and District for Two Years; Order Set Aside as Authority Failed to Record Witnesses' Unwillingness and Area of Externment Was Disproportionate.

4 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Imtiyaz Afzal Hussain Shaikh, challenged an externment order dated 22 April 2013 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police under Sec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner in Mumbai Police Act Case — Failure to Consider In-Camera Statements and Lack of Application of Mind. Externment order under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of Mumbai Police Act, 1951 set aside as the externing authority did not independently assess the in-camera statements and the appellate authority failed to provide reasons.

20 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Ganesh Bhumesh Gaikwad, challenged an externment order dated 18.08.2010 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone I, Pune City...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)