Search Results for "implied exclusion"

183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Challenges Jurisdictional Authority Over Land Ownership Dispute. Supreme Court to Decide Whether Civil Court or Consolidation Officer Holds Jurisdiction Under the Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation Holdings Act, 1947

The writ petition challenges two court orders that determined the Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over a land ownership and possession suit, arguing th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Slum Land Acquisition as Barred by Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act — Preliminary Issue of Bar of Suit Decided in Favor of Defendant No.5.

The suit was filed by the Plaintiffs seeking a declaration of ownership of a plot of land and challenging its acquisition by the State Government unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Hotel Agreement Termination Dispute. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its territorial jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rockwood Hotels & Resorts Limited, a company with its registered office in Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Arbitration Petition Under Section 14 of Limitation Act. Time spent in earlier proceeding before court lacking jurisdiction excluded, delay of 144 days condoned.

The applicant, M/s Globe Capital Market Ltd., filed a notice of motion in an arbitration petition seeking condonation of delay of 144 days in filing t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Agency Dispute — Award Declared Enforceable as Decree. Foreign Award Under Sections 46-49 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Upheld as No Grounds for Refusal Under Section 48 Established.

The petitioner, Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd., a Japanese shipping company, filed a petition under Sections 46 to 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...