Search Results for "immoral traffic prevention"

131 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 131 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR Against Customer in Immoral Traffic Case — Mere Customer Not Liable Under ITP Act. Court holds that a customer of prostitution is not covered under Sections 3, 4, 5, 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, which target traffickers and procurers, not customers.

The applicant, Dharmik Kiranbhai Lakhani, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Detention Order of Major Victim Under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act 1956 -- Victim's Fundamental Rights Upheld Over Speculative Risk of Relapse

The High Court allowed a Writ Petition filed by Victim No.3 challenging her detention in a protective home under Section 17(4) of the Immoral Traffic ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused No.5 in Human Trafficking and Immoral Traffic Case for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Mere presence in a hotel room during a raid does not constitute trafficking under Section 370(3) IPC or offences under Sections 3, 4, 5 of PITA.

The applicant, Mahesh Vinayak Patil, was accused no.5 in Sessions Case No.24/2015 arising from FIR No.II 56/2014 registered at Manpada Police Station....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Mother's Custody Petition for Minor Daughters Rescued from Brothel Under PITA. Custody of rescued minor victims under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 vests with Child Welfare Committee for rehabilitation, not with biological mother, to prevent re-exploitation.

The petitioner, Smt. Babita, mother of two minor daughters aged 15 and 16, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging orders of the Judicial Magistrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Immoral Trafficking Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 373, 366A, 368, 323 IPC and Sections 3, 4 of PITA set aside as sole witness's testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The appellants, accused Nos. 2 and 3, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No.865 of 2002 for offences un...