Search Results for "illegal retrenchment"

191 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 191 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Daily Wage Workers Seeking Reinstatement Under Kalelkar Award. Workers Held Not Covered by Award but Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation Under Chapter VA of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 15.10.19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Reinstatement Without Back Wages for Daily Wage Workers in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Daily Wage Sweepers by Municipal Corporation Held Illegal Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but Back Wages Denied for Lack of Proof of Unemployment.

The petitioners, four daily wage sweepers (Safai Kamdars), were initially employed by the erstwhile Joshipura Nagarpalika in 1999. Upon merger of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Maharashtra Police Academy Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Held that the Industrial Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a complaint under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 as the petitioner is not an 'industry' under the Act.

The present Writ Petition was filed by the Maharashtra Police Academy (Petitioner) challenging the Judgment dated 09.02.2025 passed by the Industrial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order — Employee Abandoned Service by Taking Up Employment Abroad Without Intimation. Clause 13.4 of Certified Standing Orders Validly Invoked to Terminate Employment for Abandonment of Service Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Infomedia India Ltd., engaged the First Respondent as a machine operator at its printing establishment in Mumbai. On 22 June 1992, the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal's Order Reinstating Part-Time Teacher in Retrenchment Case Under MEPS Act. Rule 26 of MEPS Rules Requires Compliance with Retrenchment Protections Including Notice, Seniority, Prior Approval, and Absorption.

The petitioners, Nagpur Shikshan Mandal and Smt. Binzani Mahila Mahavidyalaya, challenged the judgment and order dated 14-8-2013 of the School Tribuna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Management's Appeal in Industrial Dispute — Upholds Reinstatement of Workmen. Retrenchment of 7 employees by Express Publication held illegal for non-compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Management of Express Publication (Madurai) Ltd. (the appellant) against an order of a Single Judge da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement for Daily Wager in Forest Department. Retrenchment Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as Compensation Not Paid at Time of Termination.

The State of Gujarat, through the Deputy Conservator of Forest, filed a writ petition challenging an award dated 29.01.2025 passed by the Labour Court...