Search Results for "hyper-technical rejection"

61 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation in PMGSY Contract — Violation of Natural Justice and Arbitrary Action. Tender Cancellation Without Show Cause Notice and Without Considering Lowest Bidder's Rights Held Illegal Under Article 14 and 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, M/s. Mundhe Contractors, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the canc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Cancellation of Tender Process for Lease of Plots. Court holds that CIDCO's decision to cancel tender without valid reasons and without issuing show-cause notice to highest bidders is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, M/s. Aditya Enterprises and Mahaavir Superstructures Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challenging the decision of the City and Industr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Staff Selection Commission's Recruitment Process in Public Employment Case. Recruitment Notification Terms on Domicile Certificates and Post Preference Are Binding, with OBC Certificates Required to Be in Prescribed Format.

The dispute originated from a recruitment notification dated 03.12.2011 issued by the Staff Selection Commission for Constables in Central Armed Polic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Trust's Petition Against Charity Commissioner's Rejection of Sale Permission Under Section 36(1)(a) of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. Hypertechnical Approach of Commissioner Set Aside; Matter Remanded for Consideration on Necessity and Market Price.

The petitioner, Murlidhar Deosthan Bamarda, a public trust, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition Against Rejection of Section 264 Application for FBT Refund. Intimation under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is an assessment order for the purpose of revision under Section 264.

The petitioner, Hindalco Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 6 March 2019 passed by the Principal Chief Commissioner ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interlocutory Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Order Rejecting Permission to File Fresh Valuation Report Is Not an Interim Award and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34.

The dispute arises from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 22.12.2003 between Dilip Timblo (appellant) and Prashant Timblo (respondent). The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Income Tax Return for Refund Claim. CBDT's Rejection of Condonation Application Set Aside as Reasons for Delay Were Genuine and Not Habitual.

The petitioner, Artist Tree Pvt. Ltd., engaged in dealing in artifacts and finances, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 1997-1998 on 14 Sept...