Search Results for "hymen tear"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Contradictory Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Onkar Timaji Shende, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Lacks Corroboration and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Rape.

The appellant, Sunil Kashinath Shelke, was convicted by the learned District Judge-5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.41 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Contradictory Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Onkar Timaji Shende, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Prosecutrix Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC set aside as inconsistencies in evidence created reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatray @ Kashinath Babaso Khatal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Inconclusive.

The appellant, Digambar s/o Pandurang Kadu, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 506...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's evidence found untrustworthy and medical evidence inconclusive.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Kishore Vitthalrao Shendre for offences under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Rajesh @ Venkatesha @ Raja @ Raju, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri, in Sessions Case No.58/2006 for ...