Search Results for "groundless threat"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigation. Loan Recovery Dispute Not Sufficient to Attract Section 108 BNS Without Evidence of Intentional Aiding or Abetting.

The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) was filed by the applicant-accused, Ashokbhai Bhakabh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Charges Against Appellant in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence -- Investigation Upheld but Charges Under IPC and SC/ST Act Found Unsustainable

The Supreme Court examined an appeal challenging the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's discharge application -- The case originated from FIR N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application and Discharges Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Instigation or Harassment. Allegations of money lending and harassment not substantiated by material on record to frame charge under Section 306 IPC.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Gurunath Laxman Gawli and Sangita Gurunath Gawli, who were accused in Crime No.455 of 2014 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR in Arms Act Case Due to Lack of Intent and Knowledge of Possession of Live Bullet. The court held that without conscious possession and intent, prosecution under Section 25(1B) of the Arms Act, 1959, is unsustainable.

The petitioner, Tamas Sen, a 26-year-old Senior Sales Manager at Honeywell International India Private Limited, was traveling on official business fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...