Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigation. Loan Recovery Dispute Not Sufficient to Attract Section 108 BNS Without Evidence of Intentional Aiding or Abetting.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 80
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) was filed by the applicant-accused, Ashokbhai Bhakabhai Rabari, seeking quashing of FIR No.11198047251252 of 2025 lodged at Sihor Police Station, District Bhavnagar, for offences punishable under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Sections 40 and 42 of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011. The prosecution alleged that the deceased, father of the complainant, had borrowed Rs.20,000 from the applicant in 2020 and was regularly paying interest. It was alleged that despite repayment of the principal, the applicant demanded an additional Rs.30,000, causing the deceased constant stress and tension, leading him to commit suicide by hanging. The applicant contended that the allegations did not constitute abetment of suicide as there was no direct instigation or intentional aiding. The court, after hearing the parties, held that the ingredients of Section 108 BNS were not satisfied as the mere recovery of loan or demand for money, without any direct act of instigation or intentional aiding, does not amount to abetment of suicide. The court also noted that the applicant was not a money lender under the Gujarat Money Lenders Act, and thus Sections 40 and 42 were not attracted. The court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings, holding that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Abetment of Suicide - Section 108 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Quashing of FIR - The court considered whether the allegations of loan recovery and harassment leading to suicide constitute abetment. Held that mere recovery of loan or demand for money, without direct instigation or intentional aiding, does not attract Section 108 BNS. The FIR was quashed as an abuse of process of law. (Paras 1-20)

B) Criminal Procedure - Inherent Powers - Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Quashing of FIR - The court examined the scope of inherent powers to quash FIR when allegations do not disclose any offence. Held that where the allegations taken at face value do not constitute any offence, the High Court can exercise its inherent powers to prevent abuse of process. (Paras 1-20)

C) Money Lending - Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011 - Sections 40 and 42 - Quashing of Proceedings - The court considered whether the applicant was a money lender under the Act. Held that the applicant was not a money lender and the loan was a private transaction, thus Sections 40 and 42 are not attracted. (Paras 1-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings for abetment of suicide under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 40 and 42 of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011, are liable to be quashed in the absence of any direct instigation or intentional aiding by the applicant-accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed the FIR No.11198047251252 of 2025 and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

Law Points

  • Abetment of suicide requires direct instigation or intentional aiding
  • mere recovery of loan or harassment for repayment does not constitute abetment under Section 108 BNS
  • Quashing of FIR under Section 528 BNSS for abuse of process of law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:18434

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE FIR/ORDER) NO. 26891 of 2025

2026-03-12

VIMAL K. VYAS

2026:GUJHC:18434

MR NIRUPAM NANAVATY with MR VIJAY H NANGESH(3981) for the Applicant(s) No. 1, MR MANAN MAHETA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1, MR MANGAL V GADHAVI(11922) for the Respondent(s) No. 2

Ashokbhai Bhakabhai Rabari

State of Gujarat & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal miscellaneous application for quashing and setting aside FIR and criminal proceedings.

Remedy Sought

The applicant-accused sought quashing of FIR No.11198047251252 of 2025 and all consequential proceedings.

Filing Reason

The applicant-accused was charged with abetment of suicide under Section 108 BNS and offences under Sections 40 and 42 of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011, based on allegations that his demand for repayment of a loan led the deceased to commit suicide.

Issues

Whether the allegations in the FIR constitute the offence of abetment of suicide under Section 108 BNS. Whether the applicant can be prosecuted under Sections 40 and 42 of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011. Whether the FIR and proceedings are liable to be quashed under Section 528 BNSS.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned senior advocate Mr. Nirupam D. Nanavaty for the applicant submitted that the allegations do not disclose any instigation or intentional aiding to commit suicide, and the loan was a private transaction, not money lending. Learned APP Mr. Manan Maheta for the State opposed the application, arguing that the harassment and demand for money led to the suicide. Learned advocate Mr. Mangal V. Gadhvi for the complainant supported the FIR.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that for an offence under Section 108 BNS, there must be direct instigation or intentional aiding to commit suicide. Mere recovery of loan or demand for money, even if it causes stress, does not amount to abetment. The applicant was not a money lender, so Sections 40 and 42 of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act are not attracted. Continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

Judgment Excerpts

By way of preferring the present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the present applicant-accused seeks to invoke the inherent powers of this Court, praying to quash and set-aside the First Information Report No.11198047251252 of 2025 lodged before the Sihor Police Station, District Bhavnagar, for the offences punishable under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and under Sections 40 and 42 of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011.

Procedural History

The FIR was lodged on an unknown date in 2025. The applicant filed the present quashing application under Section 528 BNSS. The court issued rule and heard the parties on 12/03/2026, and passed the oral judgment quashing the FIR.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 528
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: 108
  • Gujarat Money Lenders Act, 2011: 40, 42
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigation. Loan Recovery Dispute Not Sufficient to Attract Section 108 BNS Without Evidence of Intentional Aiding or Abetting.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Refusal to Condone Delay in Appeal Against Termination. Petitioner's Multiple Forums and Unexplained Delay of Over Three Years Justified Rejection of Condonation Application.