Search Results for "gambling offence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "gambling offence"

73 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Applicant in PMLA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Money Laundering. The court held that mere association with a shell entity without direct evidence of laundering proceeds of crime does not constitute an offence under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

5 Dec 2025

The applicant, Khilji Mohsinahmed Mustakali, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) read wi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Probation to Gambling Convict Under Karnataka Police Act — Non-Habitual Offender Released on Bond. Appellant convicted under Section 80 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963 for gambling in 2007; Supreme Court allows probation under Section 360 CrPC as he is not a habitual offender and has no subsequent gambling cases.

15 May 2023

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against conviction under Section 80 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963 for gambling. The appellant, Soori @ T.V....

High Court

High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Accused No.2 in Matka Gambling Case for Lack of Incriminating Material. Section 78(3) Karnataka Police Act, 1963 requires presence or participation; mere naming in charge-sheet insufficient.

7 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Ramanji, was arraigned as accused No.2 in C.C.No.4389/2021 pending before the Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Pavagada, arising out of Crim...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Secured Creditors in SARFAESI Act Case — Holds Chief Judicial Magistrate Competent Under Section 14. The Court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting that the CJM can exercise powers under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, for taking possession of secured assets in non-metropolitan areas.

23 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court resolved a conflict among High Courts regarding the interpretation of Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Businessman for Lack of Independent Witness Verification and Non-Application of Mind. Externment under Section 56(1)(b) of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 set aside as subjective satisfaction was based on hearsay and unverified police reports without examining independent witnesses.

12 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Kamalkishor s/o Pusaram Bang, a businessman aged 57 from Jalna, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the externment order dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order for Violation of Article 22(5) in Habeas Corpus Petition. Detenu's Right to Make Representation in Language Understood by Him Upheld, Detention Order Set Aside.

22 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Surekha Deepak Shintre, wife of the detenu Deepak Shivaji Shintre, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Offence Under Section 185 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is Non-Cognizable but Police May Arrest Without Warrant if Offence Committed in Presence. Driving Under Influence of Alcohol is a Serious Offence but Classification Under Part II of First Schedule CrPC Makes it Non-Cognizable as Punishment is Less Than Three Years.

28 Nov 2013

The applicant, Ms. Rani Shashank Doshi, was driving a motor vehicle on 27 April 2011 when she was stopped by a police officer from N.M. Joshi Marg Pol...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Bail in Gambling Case — Applicants Not Named in FIR, Bail Granted Suo Motu by Magistrate Could Not Be Cancelled Without Proper Grounds. The Court held that cancellation of bail requires strong reasons such as tampering with evidence or fleeing from justice, and mere addition of Section 420 IPC without substantive evidence does not constitute sufficient ground.

26 Sep 2012

The applicants, Uttamkumar and Madhukar Wagh, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Gambling Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 6 of Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 — Police Raid Conducted Without Valid Warrant or Authorisation.

13 Jun 2011

The applicants, six businessmen from Nagpur, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against STAR TV in Kaun Banega Crorepati Gambling Case. Game Show Held Not to Be Gambling Under Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 as It Involves Substantial Skill.

31 Jan 2006

The petitioners, News Television India Ltd. and its directors, challenged the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate, 10th Court, Andheri, Mumbai dated ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)