Search Results for "food adulteration"

133 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Pan Masala Ban Case — No Offence Under Section 328 IPC. Pan Masala Not a 'Poison' or 'Noxious Substance' Despite Ban Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The petitioners, Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Piyush Kumar Gupta, and Satyanarayan Gupta, were directors of Dharampal Satyapal Limited, a company manufacturing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Food Adulteration Case Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial Compliance of Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Sufficient When No Prejudice Caused.

The appellant Vijendra was convicted under Section 7(1)/16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated buffalo m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Failure to Follow Rule 14 and Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Santosh Dattatreya Mamidwar, the accused, challenging his conviction under the Prevention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Revision Petitioner in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by M. Ajithkumar, the proprietor of Swasthik Trading Company, challenging his conviction under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Adulterated Milk in Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Case — Marginal Deficiency in Milk Solids Non-Fat Not Excusable. The Court held that prescribed standards under the Act must be strictly followed and even marginal deviation constitutes adulteration.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Raj Kumar, who was convicted under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated mil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution in Food Adulteration Case Due to Denial of Right to Second Report from Central Food Laboratory. Right under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 frustrated by Food Inspectors' failure to preserve samples properly.

The judgment pertains to two criminal miscellaneous applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the applicants (R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Secretary in Food Safety Violation — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Role. Secretary Not Present at Sampling, Complaint Lacks Averment of Responsibility Under Section 59 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The applicant, Hemant Sukaji Funde, was the Secretary of Gurukrupa Adiwasi Prathmik and Madhyamik Ashramshala, Thana, Amgaon, Gondia. He was arraigned...